“If you can paint one leaf you can paint the
world.” ~John Ruskin
“It was the Lord’s design he made apparent—
These bands, and blocks of azure, umber, gilt,
Set in their flexing contours, solid flow
That has composed itself in its own frame:
Red garnet neighbouring mica, silver white;
A slice of agate like an inland sea…”
~ Clive Wilmer,“Minerals from the Collection of John Ruskin” (Selected Poems, 1995)
Why Hopkins Matters. How Hopkins Matters.“It was the Lord’s design he made apparent—
These bands, and blocks of azure, umber, gilt,
Set in their flexing contours, solid flow
That has composed itself in its own frame:
Red garnet neighbouring mica, silver white;
A slice of agate like an inland sea…”
~ Clive Wilmer,“Minerals from the Collection of John Ruskin” (Selected Poems, 1995)
…what useful intimations might emerge if we
were to consider locating the signifying “essence” of the poetry as much in
what it does as in what it says?
If in referring to authors’ “poetics” we mean to denote not their
distinctive ideas or their stylistic fingerprints but, rather, their
characteristic practices or creativity (poesis: “making”),what might we conclude in the case of Hopkins?
As my paper’s title indicates, I am
proposing here that the distinctiveness of the Hopkins aesthetic strategy and practice is its extraordinary
dynamism. This poetry’s core business, the meaning of Father Gerard
Hopkins’ rather surprisingly being in business at all as a poet, might be called . . . busy-ness. Action,
movement, and change.
…It is much more customary, of course, to
associate or identify Hopkins primarily with his “signature” principles of inscape and instress.
Stylistics and religious thematics aside, the poetry has been most throughly
explored and valued as perceptual and conceptual expressions of the divine principles of abidingness
that materially shape and spiritually sustain the created world. The often
complex significance of those recurrent motifs of discreet individuating form (Scotist
haecceitas) and latent vital pressure are commonly understood to
constitute the meaning discerned by Hopkins in the visible world… for Hopkins, “meaning” is a verb, not a condition of
being. It is something that happens.
Something that explodes. Ethos is praxis.
Nothing in this world of things “means” unless and until it is seen to move, to
go into action, to differ, differentiate itself, almost in the Derridean sense
of active différance, beyond merely being different. Hopkins consistently subordinates even inscape and instress to
this vision of a created universe that displays and fulfils in actions (not
in form or being) the meaning and intention (in-tension) of its Creator.
…Their life is in their own action. It means
to mean what it says and does, and it means it by performing it. If there are
“themes” in Hopkins, it is in the musical rather than rhetorical
sense of the term: a pattern or figure of notes, often irregular, yet always a mimetic movement occurring in time, and
existing only in performance. As we shall see, it is no coincidence that Hopkins does turn several times to musical analogies
in naming the expressive “meaning” of distinctive behaviours, both artistic and
natural, that declare, rehearse, celebrate, and interrogate the dynamism of the
ever-changing, everfleeting universe of things. Stress is the life of
it, and verbs are the sweep and the hurl of it…
I
Let us begin with the phrase quoted in my
title – “meaning motion,” from the notoriously dense and difficult poem “Henry Purcell.”
This sonnet does virtually articulate, and perform, the Hopkinsean poetics.
Ostensibly a tribute to the distinctive musical genius of our poet’s favourite
composer, it ends by equating the effect of hearing the music’s thrusting,
thronging rehearsal to the effect of seeing the sudden wuthering open of a
great bird’s wings. This startling display of colossal plumage “fans fresh our
wits with wonder.” It is explicitly “meaning motion.” Action declares or
produces meaning, knowledge, recognition, or at least excites
our awareness of it. Likewise for the quintessence of Purcell’s music – the
poet insists that its “forg’d feature” is exhibited and experienced not in
theme or melody or familiar sweetness but in performance, in self-expressive
action.
In this sense the Purcell poem is not
primarily “about” the inscape or instress of the music or of the mind of the
composer. Inscape is a created thing’s distinctive form or pattern or law of
being – its “forgèd feature.” Instress is the vital indwelling pressure – the “archespecial
spirit” – sustaining that self, sake, make, or form. There is in both inscape
and instress, then, something latent, static, kinetic. The Purcell poem
clearly suggests that each of these conditions of natural being – forged
inscape and vital instress – assumes or displays its “meaning” only if and when
it goes into action, fulfilling itself in motion, change, performance, and is seen to
do so.
But the Purcell sonnet does more than this,
and does more than justify in God’s eyes and for God’s purposes the exercise of
merely natural artistic genius on merely natural subjects. By distinguishing an
artist’s expression of “abrupt self” from “all . . . sweet notes not his,” Hopkins also accounts for his own special kind of
poetry. We have here, scarcely veiled, the underlying principle
both of his own poetry’s idiosyncrasies (his “quaint moonmarks”), and also of
his warrant for writing at all.
~ Michael D. Moore, “Meaning Motion”: Reclaiming the
Dynamic Poetics of Hopkins
Wilfrid Laurier University. Excerpt: pp.1-3
Henry Purcell
Henry Purcell
HAVE, fair fallen, O fair, fair have fallen,
so dear
To me, so arch-especial a spirit as heaves
in Henry Purcell,
An age is now since passed, since parted;
with the reversal
Of the outward sentence low lays him, listed
to a heresy, here.
Not mood in him nor meaning, proud fire or sacred
fear,
Or love or pity or all that sweet notes not
his might nursle:
It is the forgèd feature finds me; it is the
rehearsal
Of own, of abrupt self there so thrusts on,
so throngs the ear.
Let him Oh! with his air of angels then lift
me, lay me! only I’ll
Have an eye to the sakes of him, quaint
moonmarks, to his pelted plumage under
Wings: so some great stormfowl, whenever he
has walked his while
The thunder-purple seabeach plumèd
purple-of-thunder,
If a wuthering of his palmy snow-pinions
scatter a colossal smile
Off him, but meaning motion fans fresh our
wits with wonder.
No comments:
Post a Comment